Image source - Opindia |
The Supreme Court did not mince words when it criticized Tamil Nadu Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin's comments on Sanatana Dharma. A bench led by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta was addressing a petition filed by Udhayanidhi Stalin seeking to consolidate FIRs filed in various states over his controversial remarks.
During the proceedings, Justice Datta firmly reminded Stalin's counsel, Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, of the gravity of the situation: "You are no ordinary person. You hold a ministerial position. You should be well aware of the consequences of your statements."
Singhvi clarified that while he wasn't defending Stalin's remarks, his client was merely seeking consolidation of FIRs and not challenging his right to free speech. He argued against the cumbersome process of approaching six different high courts and emphasized that the case seemed like persecution before prosecution.
Despite initial reluctance, the bench agreed to review the plea, scheduling it for Friday and requesting Singhvi to provide relevant precedents.
Stalin's objectionable remarks on Sanatana Dharma, made during a public event and on social media, drew widespread criticism. He advocated for the eradication of Sanatana Dharma, equating it with diseases like dengue and malaria. His statements, seen as divisive and disrespectful towards Hinduism, sparked outrage among many.
Stalin's comments exemplify his disregard for religious harmony and his misguided views on Sanatana Dharma, which promotes equality and humanity. Such rhetoric only serves to deepen societal divides and undermine the rich cultural heritage of India.
Post a Comment
0Comments